[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: rpm-devel
Subject: Fwd: Moderation test
From: devzero2000 <devzero2000 () rpm5 ! org>
Date: 2008-12-18 8:44:37
Message-ID: b086760e0812180044p2addfabch9bc8c701fe369061 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Someone of the rpm5 developer have problem to discuss general rpm topic, and
not only for rpm5 software, on the rpm5 user mailing list ?
FWIW, I have not.
I am convinced that rpm5.org might be the best place where a user can get
answers on topics rpm and package management in general.
At least it was (and it is) my experience, and I have dealt with
package/configuration management topic on various OS Unix as a user since
1995.
If you also have my own conviction, it would be appropriate to describe this
policy of openness - that I think there is always been - on the site
rpm5.org. Ok, openess isn't an apropiated term probably, but i do not find a
better one now.
In reality it was a long time I wanted to say.
Thanks for your attention
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Florian Festi <ffesti@redhat.com> wrote:
> Jeff Johnson wrote:
> >> No reason for moderating my posts other than that "They can." has been
> >> supplied.
> >>
> >
> > ... now what is the reason for moderating my posts?
>
> Aswering users' questions in a way suitable for an rpm5.org list[1] has
> earned you this moderation flag. This is an rpm.org mailing list and any
> posts that are not relating to rpm.org are off topic[2]. Promoting other
> packaging software is definitely off topic. If you want to advertise rpm5
> use an rpm5.org mailing list, please!
>
> Florian
>
> [1] Latest example:
> http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/2008-December/000075.html
> [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2008-October/msg00022.html
> _______________________________________________
> Rpm-list mailing list
> Rpm-list@lists.rpm.org
> http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list
>
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
Someone of the rpm5 developer have problem to discuss general rpm topic, and not only \
for rpm5 software, on the rpm5 user mailing list ? <br><br>FWIW, I have not.<br><br>I \
am convinced that <a href="http://rpm5.org">rpm5.org</a> might be the best place \
where a user can get answers on topics rpm and package management in general.<br> \
<br>At least it was (and it is) my experience, and I have dealt with \
package/configuration management topic on various OS Unix as a user since \
1995.<br><br>If you also have my own conviction, it would be appropriate to describe \
this policy of openness - that I think there is always been - on the site <a \
href="http://rpm5.org">rpm5.org</a>. Ok, openess isn't an apropiated term \
probably, but i do not find a better one now.<br><br>In reality it was a long time I \
wanted to say.<br><br>Thanks for your attention<br><br> <br> <br><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Florian Festi <span \
dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ffesti@redhat.com">ffesti@redhat.com</a>></span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, \
204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d">Jeff \
Johnson wrote:<br> >> No reason for moderating my posts other than that \
"They can." has been<br> >> supplied.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> ... now what is the reason for moderating my posts?<br>
<br>
</div>Aswering users' questions in a way suitable for an <a \
href="http://rpm5.org" target="_blank">rpm5.org</a> list[1] has<br> earned you this \
moderation flag. This is an <a href="http://rpm.org" target="_blank">rpm.org</a> \
mailing list and any<br> posts that are not relating to <a href="http://rpm.org" \
target="_blank">rpm.org</a> are off topic[2]. Promoting other<br> packaging software \
is definitely off topic. If you want to advertise rpm5<br> use an <a \
href="http://rpm5.org" target="_blank">rpm5.org</a> mailing list, please!<br> <br>
Florian<br>
<br>
[1] Latest example:<br>
<a href="http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/2008-December/000075.html" \
target="_blank">http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-list/2008-December/000075.html</a><br>
[2] <a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2008-October/msg00022.html" \
target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2008-October/msg00022.html</a><br>
<div><div></div><div \
class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br> Rpm-list mailing \
list<br> <a href="mailto:Rpm-list@lists.rpm.org">Rpm-list@lists.rpm.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list" \
target="_blank">http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list</a><br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
______________________________________________________________________
RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org
Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic