[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ros-users
Subject:    [ros-users] ROS Distribution Usage [POLL]
From:       kwc () kwc ! org (Ken Conley)
Date:       2012-10-19 22:34:07
Message-ID: CAJHuo7FUbHjQuEhYnnU1NWeviFQHvJgMtbNGwiks4FixD4nmkw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:53 PM, David Lu!! <davidvlu at gmail.com> wrote:
> Attached, please find a summary image.
> tl;dr: 80% of responders are using Fuerte.
>
> -David!!
> Personally, I was hoping for a couple Box-turtle hipsters, but alas,
> none responded.

Box Turtle? Mango Tango's where its at.

 - Ken

>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:21 PM, blackstag <blackstag at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wonder if we should do something like this for the OS involved also?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:11 PM, David Lu!! <davidlu at wustl.edu> wrote:
>>> > Hey ROS-Users,
>>> > I'm curious what distribution of ROS people are using these days.
>>> > Please consider taking 10 seconds to fill out this Google Doc form:
>>> > http://tinyurl.com/rosdistropoll
>>> >
>>> > Data is not for any specific purpose other than my curiosity. Once you
>>> > submit, you can see a summary of the results, or track them here:
>>> > http://tinyurl.com/rosdistropollresults
>>>
>>> Good idea. Thanks for posting it!
>>> --
>>>  joq
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ros-users mailing list
>>> ros-users at code.ros.org
>>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-users mailing list
>> ros-users at code.ros.org
>> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ros-users mailing list
> ros-users at code.ros.org
> https://code.ros.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-users
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic