[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       rhq-devel
Subject:    dbupgrade - Master reverted to 2.124 version
From:       snegrea () redhat ! com (Stefan Negrea)
Date:       2012-10-03 15:27:17
Message-ID: 2147192109.4254681.1349278037244.JavaMail.root () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello Everybody,

I just reverted the dbupgrade scripts to use sequential update ids. There is no \
impact for releases. However, developers that rely on master will need to either drop \
the existing database (if 2.125 was installed) or manually update it to show version \
2.124. For development purposes, the actual database should be in good shape without \
reapplying 2.124 if 2.125 was already applied.


Thank you,
Stefan Negrea

Software Engineer


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]