[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: rfci-discuss
Subject: Re: [RFCI-Discuss] abuse@ filtering [Was: postmasters that
From: Jean-Marc Pigeon <jmp () safe ! ca>
Date: 2009-02-24 0:34:14
Message-ID: 1235435654.25320.52.camel () Mercier ! safe ! ca
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 20:56 +0100, mouss wrote:
>
> while I am in, what's the group opinion on rejecting abuse@ in cases like:
> - client listed on a "major" DNSBL (spamhaus for example)
> - helo invalid (non fqdn or naked IP)
> - bogus helo ("foo.lan", "bar.corp", ...)
> - mail sent from "<>" (thus sender is not "very reachable")
> .... etc.
etc, like No MX (unlikely), bad SPF (more likely).
my opnion is we should "reject" them.
But I guess, RFC-Ignorant Project have no
other option than say:
accept "abuse" from anybody and from everywhere.
--
A bientôt
==========================================================================
Jean-Marc Pigeon Internet: jmp@safe.ca
SAFE Inc. Phone: (514) 493-4280
Fax: (514) 493-1946
Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last)
Clement' Home base <"http://www.clement.safe.ca">
==========================================================================
_______________________________________________
RFCI-Discuss mailing list
RFCI-Discuss@lists.megacity.org
http://lists.megacity.org/mailman/listinfo/rfci-discuss
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic