[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       relax-devel
Subject:    Re: relax dependencies and minfx: Migration of the 1.3 line from Numeric to numpy, alternative PDB r
From:       "Edward d'Auvergne" <edward () domain ! hid>
Date:       2007-11-30 10:41:12
Message-ID: 7f080ed10711300241q2af21a23xeaf063db8d3175d3 () domain ! hid
[Download RAW message or body]

On Nov 30, 2007 10:53 AM, Gary Thompson <garyt@domain.hid> wrote:
> Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >This issue has been talked about many times here, but I would like to
> >bring it up again.  That is the change from Numeric to numpy, as well
> >as the dependence on Scientific python.  For discussions about numpy,
> >see the discussion threads starting at:
> >
> >numpy discussions:
> >https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/2006-08/msg00005.html
> >
> >Numpy v. Numeric; Scipy V Scientific:
> >https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-users/2006-09/msg00014.html
> >
> >[bug #9732] Python 2.5 - failure in constructing the gradient of the
> >global model:  http://gna.org/bugs/?9732 or
> >https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/2007-08/msg00005.html
> >
> >ScientificPython and PDBs:
> >https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-users/2006-09/msg00041.html
> >
> >
> >Numeric is no longer maintained (and I think possibly deliberately
> >broken, well at least not fixed, to encourage people to change).  We
> >had previously considered to move to numpy but decided not to mainly
> >because ScientificPython also depends on Numeric.  But now if you go
> >to the ScientificPython web page,
> >http://starship.python.net/~hinsen/ScientificPython/, there is nothing
> >there.
> >
>
> well thats not the scientific python website anymore unfortunatley,
> However, scientific python is still developed see
>
> dirac.cnrs-orleans.fr/plone/software/*scientific**python*/
>  which also has a mercurial repository and a list of fixes (including
> numpy support!)

Ah, that's what happened to it.  I'll have to update the
http://nmr-relax.com website.  Anyway, I wasn't planning on abanding
it but just allowing it to become optional (well that's if someone
decides to add another PDB reader to relax).

Cheers,

Edward


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]