[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       racket-users
Subject:    [plt-scheme] minor suggestion/questions for tutorial on  plt-webserver
From:       grettke () acm ! org (Grant Rettke)
Date:       2009-08-26 18:02:08
Message-ID: 756daca50908261102v37e1ea09xd652d5a5075bc85d () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Abitrary!

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi<sk at cs.brown.edu> wrote:
> Guess.
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Grant Rettke<grettke at acm.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi<sk at cs.brown.edu> wrote:
>>>> 1) Since make-??? is automatically defined for structs, is considered a good
>>>> Scheme practice not to use the make prefix for anything other than structs?
>>>
>>> So for me, MAKE- is always
>>> "raw", while CREATE- implies a layer of interpolation (checking,
>>> augmenting, recording, etc).
>>
>> Was the choice arbitrary or based on the definitions of the two words?
>> _________________________________________________
>> ?For list-related administrative tasks:
>> ?http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>>
>



-- 
http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]