[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       racket-users
Subject:    [plt-scheme] Testing procedures using local-expand
From:       noelwelsh () gmail ! com (Noel Welsh)
Date:       2009-04-29 16:08:46
Message-ID: c2b7813c0904290908p23635ac7nd38f9055f178f3ad () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks. I'm rollin'

N.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Ryan Culpepper <ryanc at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> That doesn't necessarily mean that the term is bad, just that it doesn't
> match any clause of some 'syntax-case' expression.
...
> If you're putting 'sort-exprs' in another module and requiring it
> for-syntax, you need to add
> ?(require (for-template scheme/base))
> to the module; otherwise, it won't have the right bindings for
> 'define-values' and 'define-syntaxes', and the literals won't match.
> Omitting that require gives you the error you reported above.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]