[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       racket-dev
Subject:    [racket-dev] varrefs in teaching languages are actually top-level?
From:       clements () brinckerhoff ! org (John Clements)
Date:       2011-06-29 19:03:10
Message-ID: D301FAE8-9E49-40A0-A032-636B4F47A3C4 () brinckerhoff ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Jun 29, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Stephen Chang wrote:

> > I just observed something that gave me a bit of a start; it appears to me that \
> > bindings in the teaching languages are still parsed as top-level bindings, and \
> > not as module bindings.  This is weird, because I'm pretty confident that the \
> > definitions get wrapped in a module before expansion.  However, I'm seeing #f as \
> > the value for the 'identifier-binding' on variables in my beginner-language \
> > stepper test cases, and in fact in the real stepper as well.

Nix nix... I believe I was confusing the identifier-binding with the module-path.

Mea culpa, ignore my question.

John

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4624 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20110629/dc250839/attachment.p7s>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]