[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       racf-l
Subject:    Re: Trusted Attribute
From:       retired mainframer <retired-mainframer () Q ! COM>
Date:       2018-11-08 17:59:04
Message-ID: 007401d4778c$be17bae0$3a4730a0$ () q ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RACF Discussion List <RACF-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> On Behalf Of
> Prakash Lalaram
> Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 1:41 AM
> To: RACF-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Trusted Attribute
> 
> Good Day
> 
> We have recently conducted a SNAPSHOT of our production environment,
> using Vanguard Compliance Manager. The report has brought up
> Vulnerabilities that we urgently need to look at.
> 
> This is work in progress so we are starting to fix in our TEST and DEV
> environment. Measure the impact and then do the change in production.
> 
> We have a list of specific STARTED TASKS that need to be made TRUSTED.
> This is also in line with the IBM recommendation that requires started tasks
> to be TRUSTED.

It is possible that the wording of the last sentence has led me to misinterpret your \
intent but for clarity and completeness

Unless things have changed recently, there is NO requirement for started tasks to be \
trusted.  There are several SPECIFIC started tasks that IBM recommends be trusted.  \
There probably are some ISV started tasks that this may be true for also.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]