[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       r-sig-mixed-models
Subject:    Re: [R-sig-ME] comparing GLS residuals with lme + correlation=corExp(form=~1, nugget=T) residuals
From:       Ben Bolker <bbolker () gmail ! com>
Date:       2021-10-11 23:28:22
Message-ID: 4c35c0b0-eec1-ecc2-b9a8-eadaf1c59f7e () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

    Yes, that should be correct. type="normalized" should get you the 
residuals corrected for autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity (if it's 
in the model).  A lot of people (including me!) routinely get confused 
because the default residuals are "response" (i.e. accounting for 
neither heterosced. nor correlation).

On 10/11/21 7:18 PM, Javier Moreira wrote:
> hi,
> i'm trying to make a comparison between a series of models, and I'm trying
> to understand how to find the autocorrelation that the lme + correlation
> model removed.
> Is the solution to just use type="normalized"? if I do this I'm getting the
> final residuals ( with the already subtract spatial ) or the residuals
> without considering spatial autocorrelation?
> 
> if anybody has struggled with the same, I could use some help.
> thanks a lot!
> great forum!
> 
> greatings
>

_______________________________________________
R-sig-mixed-models@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]