[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       r-sig-mixed-models
Subject:    [R-sig-ME] Confidence interval around random effect variances in place of p-value
From:       Jack Solomon <kj.jsolomon () gmail ! com>
Date:       2021-04-02 22:55:07
Message-ID: CA+sL+8XgaEBMnGVPCJywV_RUjQdX0=+-xy2f7D-rj_5iwz_8eg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Dear All,

A colleague of mine suggested that I use the bootstrapped CIs around my
model's random effect variances in place of p-values for them.

But random effect variances (or sds) start from "0". So, to declare a
statistically NON-significant random effect variance component, the
lower bound of the CI must be EXACTLY "0", right?

Thank you very much,
Jack

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-mixed-models@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]