[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       r-devel
Subject:    Re: [Rd] Tiny bug in lm()?
From:       Brett Presnell <presnell () ufl ! edu>
Date:       2018-06-24 12:57:04
Message-ID: 87h8lscpgf.fsf () ufl ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]


I meant ncol(y) of course.

Brett Presnell <presnell@ufl.edu> writes:

> I suppose that this never affects anything, but in line 57 of lm.R,
> where the coefficients are defined for an empty model, when y is a
> matrix, shouldn't the value be matrix(,0,nrow(y)) rather than
> matrix(,0,3)?

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]