[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       r-devel
Subject:    [Rd] Fwd:  Two ideas / feature requests for R CMD check
From:       Mohit Dayal <ken.sensei () gmail ! com>
Date:       2016-02-25 16:14:46
Message-ID: CAJ1ju9uc5ZPSpDo6G9fp-8=C4h4eCPZEMV4x7zehBahLr-qc_w () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi All,

One thing that I've encountered with R CMD check is that if your package
uses some functions from a base package, then the corresponding NAMESPACE
imports do not seem to be automatically suggested. It might possibly an
issue with how one's system is configured, but say, with the --as-cran
switch this thing should be picked up on.

Like I felt this was something else that could be looked into :)

Thanks!
Mohit
------
mohitdayal.strikingly.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gábor Csárdi <csardi.gabor@gmail.com>
Date: 25 February 2016 at 05:40
Subject: [Rd] Two ideas / feature requests for R CMD check
To: "r-devel@r-project.org" <r-devel@r-project.org>


We all love R CMD check. :) In my opinion it would be even better if
it had options to

- Run all checks, even if one fails with an error. I realize this
sometimes might not make sense (e.g. if there is no DESCRIPTION file),
but often does.

- Run all examples even if an example fails. I think it would be great
to get all failing examples at once, so that a package author can
estimate the amount of breakage.

Thank you for considering there,
Gabor

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]