[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: r-devel
Subject: Re: [Rd] 'make check' fails on d-p-q-r-tests (PR#9326)
From: Peter Kleiweg <p.c.j.kleiweg () rug ! nl>
Date: 2006-10-31 13:16:58
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.63.0610311403400.1131 () kleigh ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]
Peter Dalgaard schreef op de 31e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2006:
> Peter Kleiweg <p.c.j.kleiweg@rug.nl> writes:
>
> > Peter Dalgaard schreef op de 31e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2006:
> >
> > > Peter Kleiweg <p.c.j.kleiweg@rug.nl> writes:
> > >
> > > > Peter Dalgaard schreef op de 31e dag van de wijnmaand van het jaar 2006:
> > > >
> > > > > p.c.j.kleiweg@rug.nl writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > 'make check' fails on d-p-q-r-tests:
> > > > > ...
> > > > > > --please do not edit the information below--
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Version:
> > > > > > platform = i686-pc-linux-gnu
> > > > > > arch = i686
> > > > > > os = linux-gnu
> > > > > > system = i686, linux-gnu
> > > > > > status =
> > > > > > major = 2
> > > > > > minor = 4.0
> > > > > > year = 2006
> > > > > > month = 10
> > > > > > day = 03
> > > > > > svn rev = 39566
> > > > > > language = R
> > > > > > version.string = R version 2.4.0 (2006-10-03)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Locale:
> > > > > > LC_CTYPE=nl_NL@euro;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=nl_NL@euro;LC_COLLATE=C;LC_MONETA \
> > > > > > RY=nl_NL@euro;LC_MESSAGES=nl_NL@euro;LC_PAPER=nl_NL@euro;LC_NAME=C;LC_ADDRESS=C;LC_TELEPHONE=C;LC_MEASUREMENT=nl_NL@euro;LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You need to be more specific (yes, it is unfortunate that we cannot
> > > > > extract all details about Linuxen from the Version: listing). Which
> > > > > distribution, did you compile youself or use a binary, and if the
> > > > > former: did you set any special compiler flags?
> > > >
> > > > config.log:
> > >
> > > 11000 lines or so deleted, and you still didn't answer the questions....
> > >
> > > (well, I can tell that it is SUSE, and it must be an old version since
> > > you are using the ancient 2.95.3 compilers...)
> >
> > Let me see...
> >
> > > Which distribution
> >
> > SuSE. It's right there in config.log.
> > And there is nothing ancient about 2.95.3 compilers.
> >
> > > did you compile youself or use a binary
> >
> > I sent you config.log. That should give you a clue.
> >
> > > did you set any special compiler flags?
> >
> > Did you read the first few lines of config.log?
> >
> >
> > Any questions I missed?
>
> Why should we care? It's your problem and your job to make it easier
> for maintainers to track down problems. Copying config.log to a public
> mailing list could be considered thoughtless, the above is plainly
> insulting.
My problem? It is YOUR software. I guess it is your job not to
give a fuck when people take the trouble of pointing out bugs.
> Maybe someone else will help you, but I have definitely lost all
> interest. For your information, the problem does not occur in SUSE 9.3
> and 10.0.
I am not the one in need of help.
--
Peter Kleiweg
http://www.let.rug.nl/~kleiweg/
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic