[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       qubes-users
Subject:    [qubes-users] Re: Qubes: intentional and unintentional plausible deniability: please decide
From:       Joanna Rutkowska <joanna () invisiblethingslab ! com>
Date:       2015-05-13 21:37:06
Message-ID: 20150513213705.GB5701 () work-mutt
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 08:51:05PM +0300, Oleg Artemiev wrote:
> Hello list.
> 
> Recent events in real life already discussed in the mailing list for
> me fit in SUBJ.
> 
> Due to subj: In simple words the qubes project owners must at 1st
> decide - are them about to implement such a feature at all? Unless
> this is decided as wanted feature I refuse to talk about my proposal
> as I usually refuse to waste my time for free.
> 
> Unless project owners decide I feel wasting my time thinking about
> fitting a feature that will  give more trouble than fun w/o technical
> advantages for a person using it.
> 
> I'm not "quitting the project" in anyway as, you know, did a known to
> us person.. but thinking of it w/o promise "we are okay with it" is
> clear cristal waste of mind resources.
> 
> 
> Any replies unless project owners decide are useless. Thank you to be patient.
> 
> ------------------------------------------details
> below-------------------------------------------
> Please excuse my verified upper intermediate russian english reading below:
> 
> The idea to think just a few times as a person who use subj. wrongly
> made my wife scary me. :))
> 
> Since at 1st I've publically committed an idea - everyone can
> implement just my proposal and play with it. But I've made all I can
> help with this at my best due to subj. Sorry.
> 
> Once asked and pass hardware lie detector user have to have correct
> intention at the moment of using deniability option.
> 
> In simple words the qubes project owners must at 1st decide - are them
> about to implement such a feature at all?
> 
> Users misunderstand. I do. And every one does.
> 
> I am okay to publically explain the real case of deniability that I
> may have to face if I'll invest some money (not that much) to finally
> solve the problem of a son of my wife in terms of loan(just a credit
> from my operation abilities) as an example that I really want
> deniability in far future.
> 
> But only if explaining real life story in public waste my time. See above.
> 
I don't understand your writings, sorry.

joanna.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=rxys
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups \
"qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from \
it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, \
send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit \
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/20150513213705.GB5701%40work-mutt. For \
more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]