[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       qubes-devel
Subject:    Re: [qubes-devel] Re: [GSoC] Qubes-MIME-Handlers Weekly Progress Report #7
From:       Marek =?utf-8?Q?Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki?= <marmarek () invisiblethingslab ! com>
Date:       2017-08-04 12:17:24
Message-ID: 20170804121724.GF8495 () mail-itl
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 03:51:32AM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> On 08/02/2017 07:59 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:33:51AM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> > > On 08/01/2017 02:54 AM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> > > > On 08/01/2017 02:53 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 12:59:16AM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> > > > > > On 07/31/2017 03:17 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 11:48:48PM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> > > > > > > > Quick update for tonight.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I've found where the most likely choke point for opening files is. \
> > > > > > > > [1] Ideally one would just make a call to extensions through
> > > > > > > > libnautilus-extension through there, wait for responses, then return \
> > > > > > > > if any extension returns a False. I'm unsure if anything in Nautilus \
> > > > > > > > on the UX side needs to happen after that (such as showing a loading \
> > > > > > > > icon or something...) but that's currently outside the scope of this \
> > > > > > > > patchset.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I've been talking to and getting help from people on \
> > > > > > > > GIMPnet/#nautilus. After explaining the whole idea to a few people, \
> > > > > > > > I've been prompted to post on the mailing list. I have now done so \
> > > > > > > > with a RFC of sorts on the idea and whether or not they'd be prone to \
> > > > > > > > accepting it upstream once it's ready.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > The post is currently awaiting moderation approval, but I'll link it
> > > > > > > > once it goes up so people can keep up with the discussion.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Great, thanks for the update!
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Andrew Morgan
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/GNOME/nautilus/blob/master/src/nautilus-mime-actions.c#L2421
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Another update,
> > > > > 
> > > > > > The mailing list post still hasn't been approved. I messaged on GIMPnet
> > > > > > about it not too long ago so hopefully the appropriate people will get
> > > > > > pinged eventually. The team is currently busy with GUADEC so it's
> > > > > > understandable they may be running behind on moderating posts on a not
> > > > > > too traffic heavy mailing list[1] :)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Does subscribing to the list workaround the issue? Some times moderator
> > > > > is set to just one, busy, person...
> > > > 
> > > > I presume that's probably the case, yeah. I subscribed before I posted,
> > > > didn't seem to make a difference :)
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > In terms of the patch, I've inserted the necessary code into all the
> > > > > > accompanying files and Nautilus builds successfully. During my testing I
> > > > > > threw a return statement in there and confirmed it blocked all file open
> > > > > > attempts silently, which is intended behavior.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > I've stuck the WIP code up on Github, currently it segfaults but the
> > > > > > cause is known. I'll be modifying the qvm_trust.py NautilusPython
> > > > > > extension to make use of this method soon, and once it all works out
> > > > > > I'll provide some pre-made .RPMs for testing.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ok :)
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > > Another status update for today.
> > 
> > > As I said mostly everything's in place, however I'm currently stuck on
> > > trying to provide the correct arguments to a function that calls the
> > > subclassed methods in nautilus extensions.
> > 
> > > Here is an example of calling a function subclassed by extensions:
> > > https://github.com/anoadragon453/nautilus/blob/master/src/nautilus-directory-async.c#L4647
> > > 
> > 
> > > The update_complete and &handle arguments are not necessary for our
> > > purposes, but the provider and file args are.
> > 
> > > Here I am calling our new method, that asks extensions whether we should
> > > open a particular file or not:
> > > https://github.com/anoadragon453/nautilus/blob/master/src/nautilus-mime-actions.c#L2500
> > > 
> > 
> > > However the provider object is NULL. That
> > > nautilus_module_get_extensions_for_type method is defined here:
> > > https://github.com/anoadragon453/nautilus/blob/master/src/nautilus-module.c#L268
> > > 
> > 
> > > That G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_TYPE always fails, so we never get any data
> > > prepended. G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_TYPE doesn't seem to be defined in this
> > > codebase either, which makes it a bit tricky to figure out why we're
> > > getting a negative value back from it.
> > 
> > > Talking to people about it on IRC has brought mixed results, it seems
> > > the extension interface hasn't been changed in a while, so most don't
> > > remember too much about it. I'll keep asking though, hoping someone in
> > > the know pops in.
> > 
> > > That's where I'm at currently, any help or clues are appreciated.
> > 
> > See this search results:
> > https://github.com/search?q=org%3AGNOME+NAUTILUS_TYPE_INFO_PROVIDER&type=Code
> > 
> > Especially this one:
> > https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-system-tools/blob/50f92695648a1d6340416c8db6eff7c38a7b3bbd/src/shares/nautilus/nautilus-shares.c#L349-L352
> >  
> > 
> > 
> 
> Alright well I've been at this for a bit again with varying success.
> 
> The issue is that this if statement here fails:
> https://github.com/anoadragon453/nautilus/blob/master/src/nautilus-module.c#L290
> 
> This is due to none of the modules in module_objects being of type
> NAUTILUS_TYPE_INFO_PROVIDER. I tried the method suggested
> (g_type_module_add_interface) but am unsure of how to get access to the
> correct module to add our NAUTILUS_TYPE_INFO_PROVIDER type to.
> 
> Looking at nautilus-sendto-module.c (part of the included sendto
> extension) it gets a module from Nautilus, then calls a method that
> registers the NAUTILUS_TYPE_MENU_PROVIDER with that module:
> 
> https://github.com/anoadragon453/nautilus/blob/master/nautilus-sendto-extension/nautilus-sendto-module.c#L33
>  
> https://github.com/anoadragon453/nautilus/blob/master/nautilus-sendto-extension/nautilus-nste.c#L190
>  
> So, nautilus-python is flexible and will do this for you given that your
> extensions asks for one of the variable provider types:
> 
> https://github.com/anoadragon453/nautilus-python/blob/master/src/nautilus-python-object.c#L651
>  
> So while writing this it seems that unless the new method (or any
> extension) is integrated into nautilus-python, it won't work to call it
> from nautilus. That wouldn't be such a big deal... if nautilus-python
> would work when I build and installed it. For that I'm having the
> following issue:
> 
> [user@dev-fedora nautilus-python]$ nautilus
> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:40: Warning:
> specified class size for type 'PyGtkGenericCellRenderer' is smaller than
> the parent type's 'GtkCellRenderer' class size
> from gtk import _gtk
> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:40: Warning:
> g_type_get_qdata: assertion 'node != NULL' failed
> from gtk import _gtk
> ^CSegmentation fault (core dumped)
> [user@dev-fedora nautilus-python]$
> 
> This happens with both my patched nautilus-python and the version
> directly from source. Some research online says that it has to do with
> importing both PyGObject and PyGTK libraries at the same time[1], which
> is interesting as both libraries are a requirement to build
> NautilusPython. This crash occurs with patched nautilus and nautilus
> from the repos, so it's definitely an issue with building NautilusPython
> in some form or another, even though the build completes successfully.
> 
> The process of building it is as follows, simply:
> 
> ./autogen
> make
> 
> Then one copies the produced src/.libs/libnautilus-python.so to
> /usr/lib64/nautilus/extensions-3.0/ and nautilus will load it on startup.
> 
> You can grab the source code from here: git clone
> git://git.gnome.org/nautilus-python
> 
> And all the dependencies on Fedora: sudo dnf install gnome-common
> gtk-doc python-devel gnome-python2-devel
> 
> And getting an error related to get_toolbar_items is normal, I just
> comment out that line. I don't believe it to be related to the segfault.

I get identical behavior.
Then switched to nautilus-3.0 branch and this one do not crash.

I get this at startup:

    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gi/__init__.py", line 39, in <module>
        raise ImportError(_static_binding_error)
    ImportError: When using gi.repository you must not import static modules like \
"gobject". Please change all occurrences of "import gobject" to "from gi.repository \
import GObject". See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709183

    (nautilus:1168): Nautilus-Python-WARNING **: nautilus_python_init_python failed

Not sure if failing nautilus_python_init_python prevent the SEGV, or
previously it didn't got that far.

BTW that SEGV was infinite recursion like this:

    #39684 0x00007fffcb7d42d2 in pyg_type_get_bases () at \
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gobject/_gobject.so  #39685 0x00007fffcb7d4672 in \
pygobject_new_with_interfaces () at \
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gobject/_gobject.so  #39686 0x00007fffcb7d4285 in \
pygobject_lookup_class () at /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gobject/_gobject.so  \
#39687 0x00007fffcb7d42d2 in pyg_type_get_bases () at \
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gobject/_gobject.so  #39688 0x00007fffcb7d4672 in \
pygobject_new_with_interfaces () at \
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gobject/_gobject.so


- -- 
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZhGXVAAoJENuP0xzK19csKCYH/0mpm/6X2IuS4dmD5A7fxrjs
jYQ35ud3cO7bD6fErPUDO27+xs22knvdFwNGDGyvbZsDpLIvAnQoPotrrpvuXNXr
vqeh/HJBhIKMi9h+6ZgAshTWyv03hzGo0S3FH7mvnmQhE5DF75di71ZXg/cVhw3X
ksDSWAy//lAKNd790jAQfEILcT5snCg5EKUNMCMif1sgSrls+lCRNJ0ZQ3mfa4UC
nIP+1L3x7h3wZRn/8DZnE4pwINdttezK7RFh3EQ9moUCttayaV0sJrUax/hEk558
sMTyZepwF39RJ1nKLTf6WhZzzPkkoCooV2c6nO0fZPSp2S/B7dlSDjq2MQAHqrM=
=wrDY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups \
"qubes-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from \
it, send an email to qubes-devel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, \
send email to qubes-devel@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit \
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-devel/20170804121724.GF8495%40mail-itl. For \
more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic