[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quanta-devel
Subject:    Re: [quanta-devel] Re: KDOM
From:       Andras Mantia <amantia () kde ! org>
Date:       2005-05-25 19:39:35
Message-ID: 200505252239.44777.amantia () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Wednesday 25 May 2005 21:28, Paulo Moura Guedes wrote:
> But there will not be any Quanta tree IIUC. We will use a tree that
> is compatible with khtml so it's very fast. This is one more reason
> to give some credit to the tree :)

There will not be *if* we can use KDOM for this.

>
> > > So, I don't see other possible solution neither any real
> > > complicated issue to solve.
> >
> > So your proposal is to keep the current implementation?
>
> No. My proposal is to drop the dual tree solution that we have now
> and cleanup the code. That would be an extraordinary enhancement
> IMPOV.

Yes, but unless someone proves me that it is usable for us, I would keep 
the current tree. But when Jens is here we will look at the 
possibilities.

> I'm going to see the Champions Leag Final and dinner now. Cya later.

OK. :-)

Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
quanta-devel mailing list
quanta-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]