[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quanta
Subject:    Re: [Quanta] KDevelop vs Aptana3
From:       Brandon Sussman <brandon () wrweb ! net>
Date:       2011-12-31 20:47:43
Message-ID: 38f9219becbd57416239afee59b601f8 () wrweb ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On 31.12.2011 11:24, Alan C Whiteman wrote:

> Because Aptana tries to be a universal IDE for programming code,
> scripting, and mark up, it has a somewhat more complex interface than
> QP. So there's some learning to do, some adjustments, and some
> annoyances (for instance, Aptana will not save your file when
> uploading; you need to save, then upload.)

It warns/saves 'em for me...  Proves your next point :)

  But once you get it
> configured to your own working habits, it is quite good. The
> application has an astonishing flexibility to be configured in just
> about any way.
>
> In addition, documentation and community support for Aptana is very
> extensive.

I miss Q+ but am grudgingly getting used to Aptana.  Since I am using a 
build discipline now for at least some work (html5boilerplate), the 
timing, switching to Aptana seems right.
-- 
Brandon
Web Sites That Work!
_______________________________________________
Quanta mailing list
Quanta@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]