From quanta Wed Jul 05 09:34:31 2006 From: Timothee Groleau Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:34:31 +0000 To: quanta Subject: Re: [Quanta] Dreamweaver concurrency compatibility mode? Message-Id: <200607051734.31534.timothee.groleau () muvee ! com> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=quanta&m=115209224024004 Thanks Sasha and Eric, I'll look into project event actions, see if I can figure something out. On Wednesday 05 July 2006 03:45, Eric Laffoon wrote: > First let me say the DW method frankly is abysmal... > * It uses the web site for a development repository instead of a test > server * It has no conflict resolution system or ability to collaborate on > a file (if one gets checked out and left in limbo what then?) > * It can't roll back changes > * There is no annotation or blame system > I could go on. Using a versioning system with a separate repository like > CVS or SVN is preferable, but some people are stuck with Dreamweaver and > hold everybody else back... I agree with you 100%. Though we should say that DW does have built-in CVS suport. The way I see it, the simple method is only there for people who don't know better about versionning systems and want something working quick. From what I've seen, although we know it's not robust, it works reasonnably well for small projects and small teams. > You can perfectly emulate the behavior using Project Event Actions and > scripts. There is also DW template behavior emulation in the scripts. > Because Andras and I will be announcing KNewStuff support finally on server > these can be shared with the community easily and improved. > > As much as I think the DW method is lame I hope to have downloadable > scripts to support it before KDE 4. That'll be great! In my case, A lot of people I work with are DW based so being able to work with them from Quanta is fantastic. Thanks again, Tim. _______________________________________________ Quanta mailing list Quanta@mail.kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta