[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quagga-users
Subject:    [quagga-users 8052] Re: Quagga / ospfv2 (version 0.99.6) -
From:       Preben Myrvoll <PMyrvoll () oslo ! westerngeco ! slb ! com>
Date:       2007-02-19 15:52:21
Message-ID: 45D9C7B5.5000007 () oslo ! westerngeco ! slb ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi

I tried to make machine A an ABR (and have its and Machine B's eth1 
interface in area 1), but I get the same results.

BTW:
eth0 on machine A is not part of OSPF, but I'm passing the route into 
OSPF by setting the interface to passive, and sending the the "network 
134.32.79.0/24 area 0.0.0.0". If this has anything to do with this 
"flapping" ?!

Thanks for all your help - again :->

Preben


I seems like the 
Gobbledegeek wrote:
> The lsa exchange is taking way too long. What if you make router A an
> ABR and put its 11.0.12.x interface in a totally stubby NSSA ?  Router
> B then becomes part of the totally stubby NSSA, nd an ASBR - if you
> redistribute external routes into ospf. Then all the lsa's from the
> backbone area of router A need not propogate to router B and I think
> quicker recovery may be possible...
>
> area 1 nssa no-summary on the ABR (just area 1 nssa on B) I think will
> be the commands for this.
>
> If B has a static or kernel default route - it will override the
> default injected by A since the administrative cost of static routes
> is lower than that of ospf...
>
> Regards
> Rahul Sawarkar
>
> On 2/16/07, Preben Myrvoll <PMyrvoll@oslo.westerngeco.slb.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I'll read attached the document - once more :-> - and see if I can come
>> up with some more thoughts. But meanwhile (for those who can be
>> bothered), here are my debug logs - from exactly when the connector is
>> put into the switch between the machines (sorry for the length of the
>> files :).
>>
>> BTW: The IP lan bits have changed from 11.0.9.x to 11.0.12.x for the lan
>> between the two machines, and to 11.0.14.x for the outer network on
>> machine A, but the behaviour is the same. But setting the  "ip ospf
>> retransmit-interval 3" casues the routes to be up after 6 - 7 seconds
>> (i.e seems like after two LSA refresh cycles)
>>
>> In the below logs (yes the A and B machine have different time - but
>> thats just the local clock), the routes come up after approx 10 
>> seconds..
>>
>> Best regards
>> Preben
>>

_______________________________________________
Quagga-users mailing list
Quagga-users@lists.quagga.net
http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]