[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quagga-dev
Subject:    [quagga-dev 9426]  Re: Better type checking for IPV4_DDR_XXX ?
From:       Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund () transmode ! se>
Date:       2012-06-15 0:55:37
Message-ID: OFFB5A208B.97FE51EB-ONC1257A1E.0005179E-C1257A1E.000517A0 () transmode ! se
[Download RAW message or body]

> To: Quagga development list <quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net>
> From: Denis Ovsienko 
> Sent by: quagga-dev-bounces@lists.quagga.net
> Date: 14/06/2012 18:10
> Subject: [quagga-dev 9424] Re: Better type checking for IPV4_DDR_XXX ?
> 
> 
> > 2. Your patch has been adopted for a RE smoke test with a change about in6_addr.s6_addr for
> consistency and a few functions to make it compile. See commit message of commit 0b9d2ac.
> 
> And there is some smoke produced by the smoke test, see commit 30a298b. Are you sure this change
> did not break your ospfd?

That was too long time ago for me to remeber. I did som tests on powerpc(we only use this cpu family) and
possibly that was it or I just missed this case. I think you might have to cast the result to int ?

Anyhow, I am on vacation the next few weeks and only online every now and then.

  Jocke

> 
> -- 
>     Denis Ovsienko
> _______________________________________________
> Quagga-dev mailing list
> Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
> http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]