[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quagga-dev
Subject:    [quagga-dev 4540] Quagga, Regarding OSPFv3
From:       blueCommand <bluecommand () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-12-24 23:44:12
Message-ID: 15937a620612241544k624f4e92gb332674c8cef663e () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Mary Christmas everybody!

I'm doing a little research and testing of IPv6 since I have a few customers
interessted in IPv6.
I'm looking for a suitable IPv6 routing daemon, for interior and exterior
usage. I'm quite fond of OSPF, so therefor I tried both Zebra and Quagga.

What I don't understand is how I'm supposed to be able to use it for routing
when I can't define areas with the usual "network" statement?
I tried the binding of interfaces to zones, but all it does is that it ends
up on the neighbour list and no routingtables are exchanged (supprise?).

Is OSPFv3 support unusable in current versions or am I just being too stupid
to see the big picture?

Greetings

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

Mary Christmas everybody!<br><br>I&#39;m doing a little research and testing of IPv6 \
since I have a few customers interessted in IPv6.<br>I&#39;m looking for a suitable \
IPv6 routing daemon, for interior and exterior usage. I&#39;m quite fond of OSPF, so \
therefor I tried both Zebra and Quagga. <br><br>What I don&#39;t understand is how \
I&#39;m supposed to be able to use it for routing when I can&#39;t define areas with \
the usual &quot;network&quot; statement?<br>I tried the binding of interfaces to \
zones, but all it does is that it ends up on the neighbour list and no routingtables \
are exchanged (supprise?). <br><br>Is OSPFv3 support unusable in current versions or \
am I just being too stupid to see the big picture?<br><br>Greetings<br><br><br>



_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
http://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]