[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       qmail
Subject:    s/qmail vs qmail with John Simpson's combined patch
From:       Niamh Holding <niamh () fullbore ! co ! uk>
Date:       2019-01-27 14:14:24
Message-ID: 89380024.20190127141424 () fullbore ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Hello,

Currently in the process of replacing a server that was running qmail with
John Simpson's combined patch.

As far as I can tell John's combined patch is no longer being maintained
https://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined-details.shtml so I'm wondering
whether s/qmail would be a suitable replacement in terms of functionality
and management?

We're currently using greylisting and on some sending IP addresses Bruce
Guenter's qmail-qfilter.

Don't think there's anything else out of the ordinary in the run scripts.

- --
Best regards,
 Niamh                          mailto:niamh@fullbore.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAlxNvMYACgkQjFUB2JvnEPnHzACgmX2fhIst/EBNeP9lyjl33ct4
mn0An10S/+9MIt4wtLJzMgluPgRhhGyW
=uLte
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]