[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       qmail
Subject:    RE: Let's start working! (Re: qmail Patch Repository)
From:       "Peter Normann" <peter () normann ! com>
Date:       2007-03-19 11:16:30
Message-ID: 00d701c76a18$0b8f79a0$062b96d5 () pete
[Download RAW message or body]

Fabio Busatto wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:46:59PM +0100, Peter Normann wrote:
>> Why not simply choose some common scenarios and then make a couple of
>> bundled patches that contain the patches needed? That is, given that
>> - for some reason - netqmail doesn't suffice and maybe that odd
>> patch. 
> 
> This is what a qmail toaster is, and toasters are already online (but
> they don't let the user decide which patch he wants in a granular
> way), and I'm trying to do something more than another toaster.

IMHO, I would think that it would be easier/cleaner/better to maintain a
list of bundled patches for each and every combination of patches then,
instead of #ifdef juggling - however futile the project as a whole may seem.

Sorry if I sound sullen.

Peter

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]