[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       qmail
Subject:    Re: Why does SpamCop suck so badly? was: Anti-Spamcop DNSBL
From:       Markus Stumpf <maex-qmail () Space ! Net>
Date:       2005-04-28 15:08:30
Message-ID: 20050428150830.GU41429 () Space ! Net
[Download RAW message or body]

Julian Haight and Ironport are liars.

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 06:31:41PM -0800, Julian Haight wrote:
> Ironport management is unhappy about this policy because of the pain it 
> causes our customers and potential customers.  We have agreed to a 
> temporary reprieve which will begin within the next few days (as soon as 
> we can update the software) and which will last through sometime in 
> July.

Although we have (up to 80% of all incoming messages are rejected at SMTP
level already)
-  rcpttochecks
-  greylisting
-  hard antispam rules
and it is April according to my calendar, one of our mailserver acting
also as a backup MX for some of our customers is/was again listed by
bl.spamcop.net two times within the last 3 weeks or so for sending out
"misdirected" bounces.

	\Maex

-- 
SpaceNet AG            | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
Research & Development |       D-80807 Muenchen    | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
"The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally
 proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin"
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]