[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: qgis-developer
Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Plans for next QGIS releases
From: DelazJ <delazj () gmail ! com>
Date: 2017-03-31 19:53:33
Message-ID: CAECJsSq7oH2w3bi5OTDZo-Sw7H8SZ3BwNmnNi-E9ibsez4LRqA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Hi,
I came across reading QGIS release schedule at
http://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/roadmap.
html#release-schedule and wonder if that really reflects the decision that
was taken. The online roadmap exposed that:
#. 3.0 will be a LTR (actually from 3.0.9 - nine months after first
release?)
#. 3.0 will be LTR for *4 months*, replaced by 3.2
#. 3.2 will be released 9 months after 3.0 (not a multiple of 4 months but
I guess it was about rescaling release dates....)
My thoughts/questions:
- I wasn't aware that 3.0 was ever supposed to be LTR. Is that the plan?
- I fail to understand the reason why once 3.0 is released, we continue to
break our "four-months release" policy. Any reason to not release 3.2 four
months after 3.0.0 and push it as LTR four months later (as usual)? This is
what I understood from this discussion but maybe i missed some points... Or
are there mistakes in the online doc ?
Btw, great idea to make distinct columns for LTR and regular releases in
the table. It really eases the reading (and remark mistakes?)...
Regards,
Harrissou
2017-02-22 18:47 GMT+01:00 Borys Jurgiel <lists@borysjurgiel.pl>:
> Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> > I think having 2.18.x and 3.2.x available in parallel for an extended
> > period is a good thing (...) but with a clear deadline for 2.18 so we a=
re
> > not stuck in the 2 release series forever.
>
> and J=C3=BCrgen E. Fischer wrote:
> > When a new LTR is released we have a period where the latest releases i=
s
> > also the LTR release. While that lasts the old LTR is still used to fe=
ed
> > the LTR and the new LTR feeds the latest release package repository.
>
> Ah great! It solves all problems.
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Hi,</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">I came \
across reading QGIS release schedule at <a \
href="http://qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/roadmap.html#release-schedule" \
target="_blank">http://qgis.org/en/site/getinv<wbr>olved/development/roadmap.<wbr>html#release-schedule</a> \
and wonder if that really reflects the decision that was taken. The online roadmap \
exposed that:<br><br></div><div dir="ltr">#. 3.0 will be a LTR (actually from 3.0.9 - \
nine months after first release?)</div><div dir="ltr">#. 3.0 will be LTR for *4 \
months*, replaced by 3.2</div><div dir="ltr">#. 3.2 will be released 9 months after \
3.0 (not a multiple of 4 months but I guess it was about rescaling release \
dates....)</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">My \
thoughts/questions:</div><div dir="ltr">- I wasn't aware that 3.0 was ever \
supposed to be LTR. Is that the plan?<br></div><div dir="ltr">- I fail to understand \
the reason why once 3.0 is released, we continue to break our "four-months \
release" policy. Any reason to not release 3.2 four months after 3.0.0 and push \
it as LTR four months later (as usual)? This is what I understood from this \
discussion but maybe i missed some points... Or are there mistakes in the online doc \
?</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Btw, great idea to make distinct \
columns for LTR and regular releases in the table. It really eases the reading (and \
remark mistakes?)...</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Regards,</div><div \
dir="ltr">Harrissou</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">2017-02-22 18:47 GMT+01:00 Borys Jurgiel <span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:lists@borysjurgiel.pl" \
target="_blank">lists@borysjurgiel.pl</a>></span>:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">Matthias Kuhn wrote:<br> > I think having \
2.18.x and 3.2.x available in parallel for an extended<br> </span>> period is a \
good thing (...) but with a clear deadline for 2.18 so we are<br> <span class="">> \
not stuck in the 2 release series forever.<br> <br>
</span><span class="">and Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:<br>
> When a new LTR is released we have a period where the latest releases is<br>
> also the LTR release. While that lasts the old LTR is still used to feed<br>
> the LTR and the new LTR feeds the latest release package repository.<br>
<br>
</span>Ah great! It solves all problems.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div \
class="h5">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br> Qgis-developer \
mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
List info: <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/qgis-<wbr>developer</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/qgis-<wbr>developer</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic