[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       qemu-ppc
Subject:    Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] s390x/kvm: Properly detect page size of initial memory
From:       David Hildenbrand <david () redhat ! com>
Date:       2019-03-28 12:53:21
Message-ID: b9621b69-4903-d5b2-11c7-59a2169a20c1 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 28.03.19 13:38, no-reply@patchew.org wrote:
> Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190328113458.8405-1-david@redhat.com/
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This series failed the docker-mingw@fedora build test. Please find the testing \
> commands and their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably \
> reproduce it locally.
> 
> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
> #!/bin/bash
> time make docker-test-mingw@fedora SHOW_ENV=1 J=14 NETWORK=1
> === TEST SCRIPT END ===
> 
> CC      aarch64-softmmu/gdbstub-xml.o
> CC      aarch64-softmmu/trace/generated-helpers.o
> CC      aarch64-softmmu/target/arm/translate-sve.o
> /tmp/qemu-test/src/exec.c:1776:6: error: no previous prototype for \
> 'qemu_getminrampagesize' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] long \
> qemu_getminrampagesize(void) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /tmp/qemu-test/src/exec.c:1780:6: error: no previous prototype for \
> 'qemu_getmaxrampagesize' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] long \
> qemu_getmaxrampagesize(void) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[1]: *** [/tmp/qemu-test/src/rules.mak:69: exec.o] Error 1
> make: *** [Makefile:449: subdir-x86_64-softmmu] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> /tmp/qemu-test/src/exec.c:1776:6: error: no previous prototype for \
> 'qemu_getminrampagesize' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] long \
> qemu_getminrampagesize(void) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /tmp/qemu-test/src/exec.c:1780:6: error: no previous prototype for \
> 'qemu_getmaxrampagesize' [-Werror=missing-prototypes] long \
> qemu_getmaxrampagesize(void) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yes, missed to commit a change. But let's see first if this is the right
approach.


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]