[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       qemu-devel
Subject:    Re: [PULL 00/15] riscv-to-apply queue
From:       Michael Tokarev <mjt () tls ! msk ! ru>
Date:       2024-03-26 9:53:22
Message-ID: 19d5ffb8-8cf1-4d88-b66a-2cf961621b93 () tls ! msk ! ru
[Download RAW message or body]

On 24.03.2024 21:12, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> On 3/24/24 12:07, Michael Tokarev wrote:

>> Unfortunately this doesn't quite work, the following changes
>> fail to apply to 8.2:
>>
>> 929e521a47 target/riscv: always clear vstart for ldst_whole insns
>> b46631f122 target/riscv: remove 'over' brconds from vector trans
>> d57dfe4b37 trans_rvv.c.inc: remove redundant mark_vs_dirty() calls
>> bac802ada8 target/riscv: enable 'vstart_eq_zero' in the end of insns
>> 385e575cd5 target/riscv/kvm: fix timebase-frequency when using KVM acceleration

> The amount of work can be non-trivial for this backport, so I'd say we should
> leave it aside for now. If someone has a good argument for this work then we
> can re-evaluate.

So, out of 15 patches in this series (minus the first one already
mentioned) - should I pick 9 remaining patches for stable (the ones
which applies) or none at all? :)

Thanks,

/mjt

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]