[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       python-xml-sig
Subject:    [XML-SIG] New stuff on w3.org
From:       martin () loewis ! home ! cs ! tu-berlin ! de (Martin v !  Loewis)
Date:       2000-12-28 10:01:42
Message-ID: 200012281001.LAA00943 () loewis ! home ! cs ! tu-berlin ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

> Forgive the abrupt de-cloak... but this is nice to hear...  I'm diving 
> quite deeply into implementing Python with PyXML, and was really 
> wondering what you (the creators) think the core aspects of PyXML are-- 
> I'm really banking on it, think its a great API, and would like to know 
> where you're headed.  

To me, the core part of PyXML are the parsers (expat and xmlproc), and
the parser APIs (SAX and DOM); for all of those, you'll see
improvements in upcoming releases.

> Anyone care to speak up about what they think the core functionality
> of PyXML should be for the long-term (in this world I think thats
> about 6 to 9 months)?

As amk explained, free software lives from user contributions. Without
any contributions, PyXML will look essentially the same in 9 months as
it does today. There is a chance that we start distributing more parts
of 4Suite in PyXML, in addition to 4DOM; these parts would most likely
be 4XPath and 4XSLT.

Regards,
Martin


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]