[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       python-patches
Subject:    [Patches] [ python-Patches-1367717 ] replace usage of UserDict with
From:       noreply () sourceforge ! net (SourceForge ! net)
Date:       2005-11-30 4:28:58
Message-ID: E1EhJaU-0001JL-0n () sc8-sf-web1 ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Patches item #1367717, was opened at 2005-11-27 15:30
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rhettinger
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1367717&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Library (Lib)
Group: Python 2.5
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wolfgang Langner (tds33)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: replace usage of UserDict with new dict class

Initial Comment:
replaces UserDict with new dict base class.

Patch against python subversion repository
revision 41544

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger)
Date: 2005-11-29 23:28

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=80475

Wouldn't this change public cgi classes from old-style to
new-style?  Could it break user subclasses?  Could it break
code relying on the existence of self.data (which is
unfortunately not a private variable name)?  If so, I don't
it is worth changing classes that are already documented as
obsolete.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=1367717&group_id=5470

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]