[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       python-list
Subject:    Re: map/filter/reduce/lambda opinions and background unscientific
From:       Terry Hancock <hancock () anansispaceworks ! com>
Date:       2005-07-07 20:47:44
Message-ID: 200507071547.44651.hancock () anansispaceworks ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 06 July 2005 09:41 am, Steven Bethard wrote:
> Terry Hancock wrote:
> > And a syntax just occured to me -- what about this:
> > [<expression> for <argument list>]
> 
> If you haven't already, see:
> http://wiki.python.org/moin/AlternateLambdaSyntax
> for other similar proposals.

Yeah, it's basically "Robert Brewer: for (no-parens) syntax 
[3]" isn't it (except that his eliminates the [], which is 
probably saner).

But hey, it's surely a good thing (in the sense of being 
more obvious) that it occured to me independently, 
right? ;-)

--
Terry Hancock ( hancock at anansispaceworks.com )
Anansi Spaceworks  http://www.anansispaceworks.com

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic