[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: python-list
Subject: Re: map/filter/reduce/lambda opinions and background unscientific
From: Terry Hancock <hancock () anansispaceworks ! com>
Date: 2005-07-07 20:47:44
Message-ID: 200507071547.44651.hancock () anansispaceworks ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 09:41 am, Steven Bethard wrote:
> Terry Hancock wrote:
> > And a syntax just occured to me -- what about this:
> > [<expression> for <argument list>]
>
> If you haven't already, see:
> http://wiki.python.org/moin/AlternateLambdaSyntax
> for other similar proposals.
Yeah, it's basically "Robert Brewer: for (no-parens) syntax
[3]" isn't it (except that his eliminates the [], which is
probably saner).
But hey, it's surely a good thing (in the sense of being
more obvious) that it occured to me independently,
right? ;-)
--
Terry Hancock ( hancock at anansispaceworks.com )
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.anansispaceworks.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic