[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       python-list
Subject:    Re: poll: does name conventions in python matters?
From:       David Fraser <davidf () sjsoft ! com>
Date:       2005-04-19 20:33:56
Message-ID: d43pvi$a8$1 () ctb-nnrp2 ! saix ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

vegetax wrote:
> in python it is common to see naming
> inconsistencies ,methods,modules,packages,classes with names in every
> posible style:
> thisisalongmethod
> ThisIsALongMethod
> thisIsALongMethod
> this_is_a_long_method
> and even This_Is_A_Long_Method
> All over the place,even within one module!
> 
> classic static languages dont really need naming conventions, on the other
> side dynamic languages must have it(in my opinion),since there is a lot of
> syntax variability and very short constructors, a clear example is what
> does this means?
> c = Required(2)
> is it a method which returns an object or is it a class constructor?
> this kind of situation greatly decrease readability.
> 
> whats your opinion on the matter?

If you really worry about it, why don't you capitalise your English? :-)

David
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]