[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       python-edu-sig
Subject:    [Edu-sig] interactive languages
From:       jason.cunliffe () verizon ! net (Jason Cunliffe)
Date:       2003-10-15 15:12:16
Message-ID: 002801c39350$61b933e0$6501a8c0 () vaio
[Download RAW message or body]

> Does anyone have a full list of interactive languages?

hmm... I am underwhelmed by a quick Google for "interactive languages" -- 
slim pickings

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=interactive+languages&btnG=Google+Search

At least I expected to find more obvious evidence of rich discussion on
this.
Yes, I barely skimmed the surface and *very* quickly, but such Google
sessions that can meaningful indicators often.

I find these weak search response quite interesting.
If you look instead for "interpreted language" it's more like what you might
expect
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=interpreted+language

Interactive == Interpreted

But that's not really the [default] point or is it?

The other way around I accept..
Interpreted  == Interactive

- Jason


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]