[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       python-distutils-sig
Subject:    Re: [Distutils] Changing the way we use the PEP process (redux)
From:       Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan () gmail ! com>
Date:       2016-01-27 12:32:57
Message-ID: CADiSq7dMYUgk8Opn+RkbJJ1HUnah3zsV5_wT+C+3qky8Xv5V=Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 25 January 2016 at 14:54, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 January 2016 at 13:30, Donald Stufft <donald@stufft.io> wrote:
> > Will we start moving the actual specifications into packaging.python.org, or will \
> > they stay in the PEP repository? I'm not sure I can tell from your two PRs \
> > currently.
> 
> The initial PRs are aimed more at documenting the status quo, so the
> current crop of specifications won't move, but may gain
> packaging.python.org annotations explaining how reality differs from
> the nominal description in the PEP (I already did this for the PEP 345
> metadata spec, and to a lesser degree for the PEP 376 installation
> database spec). I figure that's useful even if we *don't* change the
> process, so it's a good place to start.

I've pushed the big green Merge button on these changes now.

Process PR: https://github.com/pypa/pypa.io/pull/14
Live at: https://www.pypa.io/en/latest/specifications/

Specifications PR: https://github.com/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide/pull/213
Live at: https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]