[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       python-dev
Subject:    Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 408 -- Standard library __preview__ package
From:       Ethan Furman <ethan () stoneleaf ! us>
Date:       2012-01-28 18:48:31
Message-ID: 4F2442FF.7050106 () stoneleaf ! us
[Download RAW message or body]

Michael Foord wrote:
> On 28/01/2012 04:44, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> I think it's a bad idea to introduce a feature that's *supposed* to
>> break (in the sense of "make a break", ie, change the normal pattern)
>> with every release and then try to avoid breaking (in the sense of
>> "causing an unexpected failure") code written by people who don't want
>> to follow the discipline of keeping up with changing APIs.  If they
>> want that stability, they should wait for the stable release.
>>
>> Modules should become unavailable from __preview__ as soon as they
>> have a stable home.
>>
> I like not breaking people's code where *possible*.

__preview__ is not about stability.  It's about making code easily 
available for testing before the API freezes.

If nothing has changed once it graduates, how hard is it to change a few 
lines of code from

     from __preview__ import blahblahblah

to

     import blahblahblah

?

It seems to me that including a __preview__ package in production 
software is a mistake, and not its intention.

~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-dev%40progressive-comp.com
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]