[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pypy-dev
Subject:    Re: [pypy-dev] A proposal about Numpypy missing functions
From:       Daπid <davidmenhur () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-06-18 17:37:55
Message-ID: CAJhcF=37uAqBA2_v079_L2BcKXe-Fzw=ryyunKOSu4DXTo87HA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Ok, I will start working on that. Hopefully, you will hear of me again.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Daπid <davidmenhur@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have seen that there are some missing functions in numpypy that
>> could be implemented, at least naïvely, very easily. An example of
>> this is zeros_like, as we have zeros and shape. Another example is the
>> random module, easy to port using list comprehension and the random
>> module from the standard library. In any case, based on the benchmarks
>> I have seen, I think the pypy version would be even faster than the
>> pure CPython+Numpy.
>>
>> Would you be interested in a sub-optimal port of those functions? In
>> my opinion, it is better to have something not great (that could be
>> improved) that nothing at all. If so, what should I do?
>
>
> The only requirement is that they come with tests (including weird corner
> cases)
>
> Cheers,
> fijal
>
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]