'Re: defining and calling QML functions directly from Python'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pykde
Subject:    Re: defining and calling QML functions directly from Python
From:       Stefan Seefeld <stefan () seefeld ! name>
Date:       2021-09-25 13:47:01
Message-ID: 36f0d961-fe37-5017-70d6-5de8df3aba83 () seefeld ! name
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On 2021-09-25 6:28 a.m., Phil Thompson wrote:
> On 24/09/2021 19:24, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> Thanks Maxime,
>>
>> Yes, thanks for sharing your QMLWrapper class.
>>
>> Meanwhile, I have applied the attached patch to solve my current
>> problem. With that, I'm able to call QML functions even from
>> non-primary threads.
>>
>> Phil, do you think this is a sensible fix ? Feel free to incorporate
>> this into PyQt !
>
> Seems reasonable, however should the GIL be released before the call 
> to invoke() and re-acquired afterwards?

Sure, that would make sense (though I think this change is entirely 
orthogonal to the one I propose here).

Stefan
-- 

       ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...


[Attachment #5 (multipart/related)]

[Attachment #7 (text/html)]

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2021-09-25 6:28 a.m., Phil Thompson
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:7faa9a91f5d3992abb9682f115478ace@riverbankcomputing.com">On
      24/09/2021 19:24, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">Thanks Maxime,
        <br>
        <br>
        Yes, thanks for sharing your QMLWrapper class.
        <br>
        <br>
        Meanwhile, I have applied the attached patch to solve my current
        <br>
        problem. With that, I'm able to call QML functions even from
        <br>
        non-primary threads.
        <br>
        <br>
        Phil, do you think this is a sensible fix ? Feel free to
        incorporate
        <br>
        this into PyQt !
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      Seems reasonable, however should the GIL be released before the
      call to invoke() and re-acquired afterwards?
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Sure, that would make sense (though I think this change is
      entirely orthogonal to the one I propose here).<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-signature">
      <div class="moz-signature">
        <div class="moz-signature">
          <pre><img moz-do-not-send="false" \
                src="cid:part1.8C9E9079.289F1091@seefeld.name" alt="Stefan" \
                width="123" height="77">
-- 

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
</pre>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>


[".signature.png" (image/png)]
["stefan.vcf" (text/x-vcard)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic