[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pykde
Subject:    Re: License of PyQt-builder (BSD) vs pyqt-bundle (SIP/GPL)
From:       Phil Thompson <phil () riverbankcomputing ! com>
Date:       2020-11-22 11:29:54
Message-ID: 850a55709e7911a6a4eb143febb90a47 () riverbankcomputing ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 09/11/2020 11:31, Ben Greiner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am currently in the process of migrating the PyQt5 rpm packages for
> openSUSE Tumbleweed from SIP4 to SIP5. This requires a new package for
> PyQT-builder.
> 
> The website of pyqt-builder as well as the setup.py specify BSD 
> license.
> Most of the source files contain the appropriate BSD 2-clause license
> header. However, some files in pyqtbuild/bundle have the SIP-GPL hybrid
> license header.
> 
> Is this intentional? Is pyqt-builder BSD licensed but pyqt-bundle is
> SIP/GPL?

It makes sense for PyQt-builder to use the same SIP license.

Thanks,
Phil
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]