[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pykde
Subject:    Re: [PyQt] pure virtual class and sip 4.13 vs 4.16
From:       Phil Thompson <phil () riverbankcomputing ! com>
Date:       2016-02-19 9:13:28
Message-ID: 1E4282CE-DF0B-461E-BBC6-98E196AF489F () riverbankcomputing ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 18 Feb 2016, at 10:14 pm, claustre <claustre@esrf.fr> wrote:
> 
> Dear you,
> 
> using sip 4.13 I was able to generate C++ binding  for a pure virtual class a and \
> to compile but using sip 4.16 the I got a different C++ binding code where some of \
> the pure virtual functions were not available in the generated C++ code.
> 
> Is there a a new directive  about pure virtual  class needed in sip 4.16?
> 
> What I try to compile is PyQt-3.18 and it fails with the code generated from \
> sip/qt/qlayout.sip and the QLayout class.

Your best best is to compare the .sip files with their PyQt4 equivalents.

Phil
_______________________________________________
PyQt mailing list    PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
https://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]