[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pykde
Subject:    Re: [PyQt] PyQt vs thick bindings for type-safe languages
From:       Gour <gour () atmarama ! net>
Date:       2015-08-13 14:38:51
Message-ID: 87fv3nb6dg.fsf () atmarama ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Damon Lynch <damonlynch@gmail.com> writes:

> Have you considered an approach such that the Python / PyQt code talks to
> the Ada code via a messaging mechanism such as 0mq

Nope, I'm not tied to Ada, just asking 'conceptual' questions what can
one expect when using type-safe language for application's logic (which
is nice) and having advantage of RAD using PyQt.

Btw, answer in comp.lang.ad was "Writing nothing in Python!" :-)

> Depending on your needs it might be a lot easier than building an
> extension or a binding.

What do you see as 'cons' in regard to build Python extension? Just
complexity or anything else?


Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
Not by merely abstaining from work can one achieve freedom 
from reaction, nor by renunciation alone can one attain perfection.


_______________________________________________
PyQt mailing list    PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]