[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pykde
Subject:    [PyQt] Re: LGPL license.
From:       Robert Kern <robert.kern () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-02-10 21:30:24
Message-ID: gmsrlh$b90$1 () ger ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2009-02-10 15:10, Knapp wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Andreas Pakulat<apaku@gmx.de>  wrote:
>> On 10.02.09 19:56:44, Knapp wrote:
>>> I see that the newer QT4.5 has the LGPL license. Does this mean that
>>> pyQT will also have this license? Does using this license mean that
>>> you can use the lib and write a closed source app without having to
>>> pay for a license?
>> Please read the archive, this has already come up once or twice this
>> year.
>>
>> Andreas
>
> Thanks for that important point about the archives. I did read it! It
> is as clear as mud.
> QT is LGPL

Not until 4.5 is released.

> KDE is LGPL
> pyKDE is ??? LGPL???

No, PyKDE is GPL.

   http://sourceforge.net/projects/pykde

> pyQT is not?? and never will be but maybe someone named Phil is still
> thinking about it?

PyQT is currently still licensed under the either the commercial or GPL options. 
The author (that would be Phil) learned about QT's switch to LGPL the same time 
when we did, and he is still considering his options.

-- 
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
  that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
  an underlying truth."
   -- Umberto Eco

_______________________________________________
PyQt mailing list    PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]