[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pykde
Subject:    Re: [PyQt] Proposal for New-style Signals
From:       Ewald de Wit <erdewit () zonnet ! nl>
Date:       2008-01-22 14:28:15
Message-ID: 200801221528.15901.erdewit () zonnet ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 21 January 2008 16:20:16 Phil Thompson wrote:

> Question: An alternative approach would be to define a "default" signal (in
> the .sip files) which would identify the overload to be used with the
> "short form".  As most Qt signals aren't overloaded this would mean that
> the type string would not have to be specified in the majority of cases. 
> Is this worthwhile? (My feeling is yes.)

This approach makes the common case simple and the uncommon case possible,
so it must be a good design. The less a Python user has to worry about the C++ 
signature string, the better.

My feeling is this approach would be very valuable.

--
  --  Ewald




_______________________________________________
PyQt mailing list    PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]