[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pykde
Subject:    RE: [PyQt] simpler 'connect' function
From:       "Peter Shinners" <pshinners () blizzard ! com>
Date:       2008-01-14 21:20:45
Message-ID: EFF2EC227B08C542A0A947FF5D1A99F1063238C4 () BL-EXCHANGE ! corp ! blizzard ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

> No, but a few ideas have been thrown around on the list in the past
couple
> of days.
>
> Your suggestion is nice and concise - the dropping of SIGNAL() was
briefly
> discussed during developed of PyQt4.

Allowing string arguments for the signal/slot name would be a good
improvement. Hopefully the change can be made for connect and emit.

I'd still vote for connect to be a method on QObject instances. Since
the first argument to connect must always be a QObject instance (?), it
would cut down on the awkwardness.

_______________________________________________
PyQt mailing list    PyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic