On Wednesday 20 July 2005 08:28, Phil Thompson wrote: > The biggest bottleneck for PyQt4 is pyuic4. > On > the other hand this is something that is self-contained and (apart from > actually being able to execute the generated code) independent of the rest > of PyQt4 development. So it's something that somebody else could run with > quite easily. What is the best route for doing this? Does it make sense to have a PyQt4-minus-pyuic release to enable community development of a Qt4 pythonic uic? Or do you anticipate that a pythonic uic wrtten for Qt3 would be a reasonable starting point for Qt4 support? -- Toby Dickenson (who still hasnt looked at Qt 4 :-( _______________________________________________ PyKDE mailing list PyKDE@mats.imk.fraunhofer.de http://mats.imk.fraunhofer.de/mailman/listinfo/pykde