[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       procmail
Subject:    Re: Recipe on "subject contains"
From:       "David W. Tamkin" <dattier () panix ! com>
Date:       2004-05-29 17:28:27
Message-ID: 40B8C83B.50808 () panix ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

When I said that there are people like this:

 >> 1. Someone on a reply-to-sender list doesn't grasp the notion of
 >> using the MUA's reply-to-all function and always sends public
 >> replies to posts by starting a reply and replacing the previous
 >> author's address with that of the list.

Sean replied,

 > Heh, it's easy enough to [Reply All] and DELETE the addresses which
 > don't belong.

But as I said, these are people who don't grasp the concept of using 
reply-to-all in the first place.  I knew one who was screaming for an 
RTS list to be changed to RTL until somebody told him that his mailer 
had a reply-to-all command.  When he tried it and saw that the RTS 
configuration gave him a choice, he was very happy with it.  At least
he was open-minded; most aren't.


_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail@lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]