[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       procmail
Subject:    Re: Headers
From:       wje () netcom ! com (William J !  Evans; mail protected by spamgard{tm})
Date:       1997-07-31 18:43:19
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

=== Nothing above this line is part of the message. ===

dhill@sunbeach.net wrote:
:I don't know if anyone has seen this set of headers, but someone might
:want them for extra filtering info (spamgard) etc..
:
:From: conserve@savetrees.com
:X-Authenticated: (root@[204.137.222.250])
:X-4: THIS MAIL WAS SENT THROUGH IEMMC'S NEW REMOVE FILTRATION SYSTEM!
:X-Advertisement: Visit http://www.iemmc.org for name removal
:information.

[etc.]

I try to make a point of keeping spamgard(tm)-related stuff off this
list, but I'd like to clear up a misconception here.

spamgard(tm) does not do its work by recognizing that a given piece of
mail is spam, as the above-quoted material assumes.  Therefore, users
of spamgard(tm) can be serenely indifferent to whatever header lines
make spam recognizable.

Signatures Follow. (tm)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBM+DNBO7FqQNEGv6lAQG0hQQAlbxtRKdApoDru9QUV+CtBuV6d89lfkI0
N7iMccI8M+gq73z70lp42fbAb+K52mJwPRFCPAXm3bvg5/ygfY/Btm8BCg0V4klA
8/NV7MWrgx9b4/CWZdTu5Nyrk8GCXWDWCHVzFRdoJc5vuVnHhBzHRHirt9S8UZgB
LpHAjqp2cJM=
=zHTy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- It is now safe to turn off your computer.
Bill Evans/Box 4829/Irvine, California 92616/(714)551-4829  _   /| ACK!
Email-To: wje@acm.org  -- PGP encrypted mail preferred. --  \`o_O' /
   Finger wje@netcom.com for public key.   Key #: 441AFEA5   =( )=
PGPprint: FB D0 1C 1D EF DC 26 BA  B3 9E 84 0B 40 D6 59 9C     U

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]