[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       privoxy-developers
Subject:    Re: [privoxy-devel] Leaving SF
From:       Lee <ler762 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-04-30 12:38:35
Message-ID: CAD8GWssVs=xtogOQySup1TFgD7wY-ykTNi0d0FxysF9iia4OQQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 4/29/14, Fabian Keil <fk@fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> Lee <ler762@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 4/28/14, Fabian Keil <fk@fabiankeil.de> wrote:
> > > Lee <ler762@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Is SF all that bad?   I just answered one of the privoxy support
> > > > requests & it looks like it worked even tho the only sites I allowed
> > > > were sourceforge.net and fsdn.com
> > > 
> > > I can still reproduce the no-CSS-issue if fonts.googleapis.com:443
> > > isn't reachable or blocked.
> > 
> > Have you started a list somewhere?
> 
> Not yet.

If you do start a list, it might be worth noting the nationality of
the provider:
     If you use cloud services offered by US companies, then there's
no corner of
     the globe where your data is private or safe from the prying eyes
of the US government.
 http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/judge-microsoft-hand-over-cloud-data-no-matter-where-world-it-stored



> > > I was told per private mail that SF could commit to change priorities
> > > for the "no-JS editing on tickets" and I was asked whether or not that
> > > was "enough for you to change your mind and stay with us".
> > > 
> > > In my opinion this would be not enough, but obviously that's not
> > > the only opinion that matters and if the JavaScript problems were
> > > actually fixed (which hasn't been promised (yet)) SF would certainly
> > > look a lot less poorly when we compare it with alternatives before
> > > finally deciding if we should migrate away from SF.
> > 
> > I still have a favorable opinion of SF.. it might take a while to get
> > something fixed, but they're not collecting any money from us, so I
> > guess I'm looking at that as part of the price that we are paying.
> 
> We currently pay with our users' personal data. In my opinion
> that's a rather high price given the poor service we get.

I'm not so sure about poor service .. unless you're talking about how
long it takes to get a requested change made (like "no-JS editing on
tickets")?

Lee

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Ijbswa-developers mailing list
Ijbswa-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ijbswa-developers


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]