[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: Logical Replication Issue
From:       Donzell White <whitedv () verizon ! net>
Date:       2020-06-30 18:05:28
Message-ID: 1666701639.381721.1593540328899 () mail ! yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

My table has a primary key.=C2=A0 In addition, this is an initial load issu=
e where the replication identity should not matter.


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Lewis <mlewis@entrata.com>
To: Donzell White <whitedv@verizon.net>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tue, Jun 30, 2020 1:05 pm
Subject: Re: Logical Replication Issue

Per the release notes, there are some enhancements to logical replication t=
hat came after 11.5 like 11.8 particularly related to replication identity =
full. Do you have a primary key or unique index that is being used for the =
replication identity?
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div style="color:black;font: 10pt arial;">My table has a primary key.&nbsp; In \
addition, this is an initial load issue where the replication identity should not \
matter.<br> <br>
<br>

<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica;font-size:10pt;color:black">
<div class="aolmail_wmstd_quote">
<div>-----Original Message-----<br>
From: Michael Lewis &lt;mlewis@entrata.com&gt;<br>
To: Donzell White &lt;whitedv@verizon.net&gt;<br>
Cc: pgsql-general &lt;pgsql-general@postgresql.org&gt;<br>
Sent: Tue, Jun 30, 2020 1:05 pm<br>
Subject: Re: Logical Replication Issue<br>
<br>

<div id="yiv3322968157">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Per the release notes, there are some enhancements to logical \
replication that came after 11.5 like 11.8 particularly related to replication \
identity full. Do you have a primary key or unique index that is being used for the \
replication identity?</div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]