[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Misleading comment in slru.h
From:       Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut () 2ndquadrant ! com>
Date:       2017-06-30 18:43:40
Message-ID: c6f518db-1446-0f48-5c6c-ebeef92f0a1c () 2ndquadrant ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 6/27/17 01:43, Thomas Munro wrote:
> As mentioned in another thread[1], slru.h says:
> 
>   * Note: slru.c currently assumes that segment file names will be four hex
>   * digits.  This sets a lower bound on the segment size (64K transactions
>   * for 32-bit TransactionIds).
> 
> That comment is out of date: commit 638cf09e extended SLRUs to support
> 5 character names to support pg_multixact and commit 73c986ad extended
> support to 6 character SLRU file names for pg_commit_ts.
> 
> Should we just remove that comment?

done

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]