[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
From:       Mithun Cy <mithun.cy () enterprisedb ! com>
Date:       2017-01-31 16:52:59
Message-ID: CAD__OugHoWdW=xLfv_AgwmrcSAMWO_gS2D8YDFFAhJt=GsvTYw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now, I assume that this patch sorts the I/O (although I haven't
> checked that) and therefore I expect that the prewarm completes really
> fast.  If that's not the case, then that's bad.  But if it is the
> case, then it's not really hurting you even if the workload changes
> completely.

-- JFYI Yes in the patch we load the sorted
<DatabaseId,TableSpaceId,RelationId,Forknum,BlockNum>.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]